science

Post image for Darwinism, Gambling & God

Two things have been mixing in my brain this morning…

Last week while we were back inĀ  my hometown my step-brother turned 21 so we went out with my parents and took him to the “casino” to have him play $5 worth of slots. I’m not going to go into my thoughts on the morality of gambling, but it did get me thinking – we’ll get to that.

Recently a lot of the theology-heavy blogs that I read have been talking about Darwinism, neo-Darwinism & Theistic Evolution. One that I just read talks about evolution in terms of design versus chance and argues that evolution cannot be reconciled with design because evolution is inherently based on random chance . I think he’s arguing from a definition of evolution that is over-specific and therefore does not address the real debate, but I’m going to ponder on a spin-off point.

Chance.

As I drove away from the casino I pondered “chance” and its relationship to the sovereignty of God. It’s important to remember that “chance” is only descriptive, not prescriptive. We say that a coin has a 1:1 chance of coming up heads or tails because when we flip a coin that is what happens. Chance itself does not exist, what we call “chance” is only a description of reality – an article on LiveScience.com talks about this:

Perceptions of risk factors can change over time simply because more is learned. The chances of an Earth-impacting asteroid killing you have dropped dramatically, for example, from about 1-in-20,000 in 1994 to something like 1-in-200,000 or 1-in-500,000 today.

Notice the language that the author uses, “the chances… have dropped.” Reality hasn’t changed, only our ability to accurately describe it. The likelihood of outcomes on a coin-toss being 50% only describes the perfect coin, but if actually tested each coin may be 50.000001:49.999999 or something similar. So, my question is whether God is actively working in that .000001%

Here are some questions to ask… which I don’t have an answer for:

  • In what way is God sovereign in chance-related situations?
  • Is his involvement based on the gravity of the win or loss or on every throw? Is he actively the muscles in the hands & arm (as well as every detail the dice-manufacturing process) to guide the number to come up in every throw? If he does influence/control every throw does it go all the way back to our DNA and his choosing of each molecule that would control our hand’s development?
  • If he does choose each gene, does he do it with an “eye to” every movement that muscle will ever make therefore influencing/controlling every pen stroke we make, every handshake, every die-throw and every catch we make (or drop) in every sport we ever play?
  • Our DNA is determined by every generation that has ever come before us. Did he have an “eye to” our DNA and it’s dice-rolling implications as all 128 of our great-great-great-great-great grandpas’ gametes merged with each of our great-great-great-great-great grandmas’ gametes? (And every generation before and after that?)
  • Does God choose to work within finite rational “chance” paradigms on things like coins & dice? (This one feels like a silly question, but I feel that it should be asked as well.)

How you answer these questions does influence how you perceive the validity of Theistic Evolution as a Biblical/Christian creation model.

Any feedback or ideas?

Post to Twitter

Post image for Question Spiritual Authorities

So, I subscribe to an email news letter for a ministry called Reasons to Believe, yesterday it included this:

Dan Brown, best-selling author of The DaVinci Code and of the highly anticipated novel The Lost Symbol, made an intensely personal revelation in an interview with Parade magazine (September 13, 2009). He described how a pastor’s response to his probing questions about science and the Bible led him to “gravitate away from religion.” More recently, though, Brown has come to see “an order and a spiritual aspect to science.”

This sends my mind down two trails. One thinking about how science and faith don’t have to be at odds and the other about how disregarded and downplayed questions turn honest inquirers into cynical agnostics (at best) or at worst skeptics who don’t look ask enough question and write best selling books that are filled with falsehoods.

I’ll go down trail number 2.

When I was working as a campus minister at Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, I had an opportunity to build a relationship with the Wiccan and Neo-Pagan group on campus. They had tried to organize as an official student organization and the student government board tried to turn them down because they were a “unusual religious group.” I helped to lead the charge of Christian groups who backed them up and eventually helped to get them recognized as an official group on campus. Why? Because EUP is a state school and legally they can’t deny them, but (more importantly) they have the right to use their student activities fees to organize however they want as long as they have enough students.

For a while some of us went to their weekly meetings and some of them came to our weekly meetings – because we were friends. On three or four occasions Carrie and I hung out with them for a few hours afterward in one of their apartments (on their own turf). While we were there Carrie asked a great question:

What was it that made you decide to be Wiccan or to believe what you do now?

With only a single exception all of them told stories of asking parents, pastors or some other spiritual authority in their life a question that was a difficult question. Some of them asked why it was okay that God had the Hebrews kill people in the Old Testament, others asked how Jesus was both human and God at the same time, one I think even asked a question about dinosaurs. All of them either got in response an angry “Don’t ask questions like that. Others simply got a dismissive, “What does that matter? Just believe it.

They don’t ask those questions anymore, because they have dismissed the Christian faith entirely.

I don’t know that I blame them. Actually, I know that I don’t blame them.

If the Christian faith is true we should not be afraid of questions – it can handle it. If it’s true we should not be afraid to say “I don’t know,” if we can’t we probably need to repent of being arrogant enough to think that we know everything. You can even say, “I think this, but I’m not sure, let’s try to figure that out together.”

So, what about dinosaurs, the Trinity, free will, predestination, how the world will end, how it started, how many angels fit on the head of a pin, and how can Jesus be both God and human?

I don’t know for sure, but I think I can give some of the answer…

Well, except for the angels thing… that’s just a stupid question.

Post to Twitter

Life on Mars

August 16, 2008

in everything

So, as Carrie and I were listening to the NPR game show “Wait, Wait, Don’t Tell Me” they talked about a chemical that was found on Mars’ surface that they are saying would hinder the chances of finding life there. I don’t know what the chemical is and it doesn’t matter when it comes to my question. I’ve read a couple of articles stating that it would indeed be dangerous for life there and would hinder it’s survival; so here’s my question that I think is rooted relatively well in evolutionary theory:

Wouldn’t life on Mars have evolved in such a way that the substance would either end up being beneficial (at best), guarded against or a non issue (worse)? There are plenty of chemicals and compounds here that can be harmful, but life here uses or just ignores (oxygen, carbon dioxide, etc.) would that not also happen with this specific chemical if life were to occur on Mars?

I think the issue lies in the fact that people who hear these things don’t understand how the evolutionary theory is supposed to work – things evolve to adapt to their environment. Life adapted to Earth’s environment would not be able to hand the compound well, but then again life from Mars might find some other substance that we don’t even think about deadly.

There seems to be one article that I’ve found that at least questions these evaluations as well.

Post to Twitter

starving upon individualism

December 19, 2007

How is it that the Bible seems to claim this? Don’t get me wrong, I really do believe in the Bible as the Word of God. Spurgeon writes this morning: Be wise and attend to the obeying, and let Christ manage the providing. Come and survey your Father’s storehouse, and ask whether he will let [...]

Read the full article →