web design

Your website, flier, magazine, or whatever product – should make sense. It should be intuitive and take into consideration the ways that people will really use it.

Last week, fellow NoVA resident Nathan Herald wrote about his love of good product design.

I want to create content management systems, ecommerce platforms, reusable tools, and other internet related things. I also catch myself wanting to design clothing, bags, storage solutions, and other things that I interact with often. If I can’t find something I love then I want to make it.

[...]

A balance between being terribly useful and practical while being awesomely intuitive and usable and pleasing to the eye seems to be very important to me. I see examples of this everywhere in my house: iPhone, Puma shoes, white fitted hat, front pocket wallet, G2 .5mm pens, moleskins, and many more.

While his shorts of choice (they are held together by about 40 safety pins) might call this love of his into doubt, he makes a great point. The products & websites that we love are the ones that balance beauty and intuitive design.

  • Moleskine products lay flat so it’s easy to write in them.
  • Google’s main page is their logo and a search box. (Until today, I guess.)
  • The iPhone and iPad have become famous for how easy they are to use for a complete novice.

This week two sites that I spend a lot of time on released updates to their design.

DesiringGod.com rolled out a new beta version of their site. I’m not concerned as much with the features as the fact that they added a video with their senior web manager (the ministry has a whole team for their website) explaining the reason why they did. The redesign is to better mobilize people to use the site and to help them be empowered to use the information there in the rest of their lives.

Crossway Bible publishers released a new edition of the English Standard Version’s website. I love the new design. (Some of the better features require you to purchase access to the study notes.)

  • Linked Note Scrolling: This was my biggest peve in the old version. I’d be reading a passage and wanted to look at the notes on that passage and I’d have to scroll around to find them on the side. Now the two boxes are linked. When I am at verse 5 so is the verse pane.
  • Movable Tool Tabs: Do you want your notes on the right? Drag them there. On the left? Drag them back.
  • Bookmarks: you can place virtual bookmarks in your online Bible. They work just like real ones. They stay until you move them somewhere else and all you have to do is click on one of them to go to that passage.
  • Infinite Scrolling: You don’t ever have to use pagination links to go to the next chapter, just keep scrolling down.
  • Column Reordering: Want your sidebars on the left? Right? Both sides? Just one sidebar? Do it.
  • Highlighting & Sharing: Just highlight a passage  and choose a color or click the share (or copy or add a note) link.

Websites should be fully featured and beautiful.

How do you move toward this in the things you create & use?

Post to Twitter

Improvements Needed

March 19, 2009

in everything

There is a major website that my employer has as an outreach to college students around the country that also powers subsidary sites that can be customized for individual campus use. In past years it has been very effective at opening the door for students to interact with the Gospel in a safe environment and on a level that  is accessable to someone who doesn’t necessarily come from a faith background.

There’s an issue though, the design of the site is about 9 years old. The reality is that web-users are fickle and picky (I’m going to coing a new word – pickle), and if we’re really trying to get the message to students effectively we need to be removing roadblocks from the way. The New Testament says that the Gospel is “a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offense,” it’s gong to piss people off and make them angry – we need to make sure that they are wrestling with the Gospel and not the things we attach to it or attach it to.

At one point the website was reporting approximately a 1% rate of people indicating a decision to follow Jesus Christ which is great, but as I’ve run some of the campus-specific subsidiary sites I’ve noticed that the number of “indicated decisions” are not very correlational with the total number of visitors. (When we have 10 hits in a month we have 3 indicated decisions, when we have 100 hits in a month, we have 4… those numbers are generalizations, but they are faithful to the reality; not exaggerations.)

Also, some of the articles themselves (one that I can think of specifically, but there are others) connect the faith to secondary or tertiary doctrinal  stances that are not endemic to our organization and definitely to the faith as a whole.

So, there are numbers issues, some aesthetic issues and some content issues.

The question is – how do I address these issues when the sites have been effective in the past, I don’t really know the people running the sites and I’ve been assigned to take a break from tech stuff for now?

Post to Twitter

another redesign

November 27, 2008

in everything

About once a year I like to re-design my blog just for fun.

I’m in the middle of one now. It should be complete soon, but it’s kind of ugly now.

Post to Twitter

Where did the last month and a half go?

October 13, 2008

For as much time as I spend on here, you’d think I’d update my own blog pretty often. Wrong. I’d love to. One of my goals for the year was to post something of substance on here every other day. Didn’t happen. Not even close. Since August 27th, huh? I mean, “Ride the Snake” doesn’t [...]

Read the full article →